DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

051357P.pdf   01/31/2006  Watson Coatings  v.  American Express
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-1357
   Eastern District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Heaney and Benton, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Uniform Fiduciaries Act. Where a bank or payee electronically processes checks pursuant to its normal procedures and does not employ automated procedures that unreasonably vary from general banking usage, no genuine issue of material fact exists as the whether the payee's automated processing of checks is commercially reasonable, and the district court did not err in granting American Express's motion for summary judgment based on its argument that it acted in good faith in compliance with the Uniform Fiduciaries Act; nor did plaintiff establish that American Express had actual knowledge that plaintiff's employee was breaching her fiduciary duty when she wrote the checks; there was no genuine issue of fact as to whether American Express, as payee, qualified as a holder in due course; American Express can rely on its holder-in-due course status as an affirmative defense to plaintiff's common law claims for money had and received and unjust enrichment.