DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
051357P.pdf 01/31/2006 Watson Coatings v. American Express
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 05-1357
Eastern District of Missouri
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Heaney and Benton, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Uniform Fiduciaries Act. Where a bank or payee
electronically processes checks pursuant to its normal procedures and
does not employ automated procedures that unreasonably vary from
general banking usage, no genuine issue of material fact exists as the
whether the payee's automated processing of checks is commercially
reasonable, and the district court did not err in granting American
Express's motion for summary judgment based on its argument that it
acted in good faith in compliance with the Uniform Fiduciaries Act; nor
did plaintiff establish that American Express had actual knowledge that
plaintiff's employee was breaching her fiduciary duty when she wrote the
checks; there was no genuine issue of fact as to whether American
Express, as payee, qualified as a holder in due course; American Express
can rely on its holder-in-due course status as an affirmative defense to
plaintiff's common law claims for money had and received and unjust
enrichment.