051555P.pdf   11/02/2005  United States  v.  Jason Douglas Oman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-1555
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Arnold and Hansen, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - criminal law. In a prosecution for bank robbery, the
   district court did not err in admitting evidence concerning defendant's
   prior bank robbery convictions, as the crimes were similar in nature and
   were only separated by seven years; even if admission of the evidence
   was error, it was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence of
   defendant's guilt; district court did not err in sentencing defendant as a
   career offender because his prior conviction for aiding and abetting the
   burglary of a school building was a crime of violence for purposes of
   Guidelines Section 4B1.2(a).