DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

051565P.pdf   03/23/2006  Sandra J. Chronister  v.  Baptist Health
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-1565
                          and No:  05-1566
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Heaney and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - ERISA. Defendant's employee benefit plan was not exempt from ERISA as a "church plan;" church plays no role in the governance of the defendant hospital, does not provide any financial support and any denominational requirement is limited to certain high level employees; there was no financial conflict of interest present in the decision to deny benefits, and a less deferential standard of review is not justified on that ground; nor were there any procedural irregularities in the review process which would justify imposition of a de novo standard of review; trigger- point findings consistent with fibromyalgia constitute objective evidence of the disease, and plaintiff's condition, since it was supported by objective evidence, was not subject to the 24-month benefit cutoff applied to conditions based on subjective claims with only self-reported symptoms.