DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
051565P.pdf 03/23/2006 Sandra J. Chronister v. Baptist Health
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 05-1565
and No: 05-1566
Eastern District of Arkansas
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Heaney and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - ERISA. Defendant's employee benefit plan was not exempt
from ERISA as a "church plan;" church plays no role in the governance
of the defendant hospital, does not provide any financial support and any
denominational requirement is limited to certain high level employees;
there was no financial conflict of interest present in the decision to deny
benefits, and a less deferential standard of review is not justified on that
ground; nor were there any procedural irregularities in the review process
which would justify imposition of a de novo standard of review; trigger-
point findings consistent with fibromyalgia constitute objective evidence
of the disease, and plaintiff's condition, since it was supported by
objective evidence, was not subject to the 24-month benefit cutoff
applied to conditions based on subjective claims with only self-reported
symptoms.