051666P.pdf   03/16/2006  USA  v.  Paul David Anderson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-1666
   Western District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Hansen,
   Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Where a new judge sentenced defendant to
   a longer sentence on remand, there was no presumption of vindictiveness,
   and defendant failed to meet his burden to prove that the longer sentence
   was motivated by actual vindictiveness; record showed district court did
   not impose an additional two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec.
   3A1.1(b)(2) for "large number of vulnerable victims;" district court did
   not err in imposing a two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec.
   3A1.1(b)(1); the district court did not err in imposing enhancements for
   both abuse-of-trust and vulnerable victims, as it is possible to have both
   enhancements in the same case; sentence was reasonable under Booker.