DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

052201P.pdf   02/09/2006  United States  v.  Robert Voegtlin
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2201
   Eastern District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Riley and Hansen, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction. District court did not abuse its discretion
   in admitting testimony of co-defendant about prior drug dealings to show
   knowledge; limiting instruction guarded against unfair prejudice. 
   Evidence was sufficient to establish conspiracy to possess
   pseudoephedrine with reason to believe it would be used to manufacture
   methamphetamine during the life of conspiracy based on role as supplier
   and broker of chemicals. Ample evidence supported enhancement for
   "use" of a minor; knowledge of age is not required. Role of offense
   adjustment was not error based on defendant's instructions to others to
   obtain pseudoephedrine. Quantity of drugs attributable to defendant was
   reasonably foreseeable.