052275P.pdf   07/21/2006  Design Professionals  v.  Chicago Ins. Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2275
                          and No:  05-2326
                          and No:  05-2276
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
   [PUBLISHED] [Arnold, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Insurance. Insurer was under no statutory duty to provide
   insured with a notice of termination, and the district court erred in
   concluding violation of Ark. Code Ann. Sec. 23-79-3063(B) could serve
   as the basis for a breach of contract claim in the circumstances of this
   case; misstatements in letter concerning coverage did not amount to a
   violation of Rule 43 of the Arkansas Insurance Department; under
   Arkansas law, the equitable estoppel doctrine may not be used to enlarge
   or extend coverage or to create an insurance contract; district court erred
   in finding two accounting firms had not completed a merger for purposes
   of determining whether one of the merged companies' coverage applied
   to the underlying claims.