052324P.pdf   01/06/2006  USA  v.  Thomas Mickelson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2324
   District of Northern Iowa   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with McMillian and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The government's argument that the 
   appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review sentences for 
   reasonableness when they are within the guidelines range is rejected 
   as inconsistent with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742, Booker and the Sixth 
   Amendment; a guidelines sentence, although presumptively reasonable, 
   can still be unreasonable when all of the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. 
   Sec. 3553(a) are considered; defendant did not waive his right to appeal 
   his sentence in his plea agreement; sentence was reasonable; district 
   court did not abuse its discretion or improperly delegate its 
   sentencing authority by leaving the imposition of certain conditions 
   for supervised release - remote alcohol testing, video information 
   capture or use of a GPS monitoring system - to the discretion of the 
   probation officer; imposition of restrictions on contact with minor 
   children was a reasonable condition of supervised release in a 
   conviction for possession of child pornography.