DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

052456P.pdf   07/29/2008  Herbert Smulls  v.  Donald Roper
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2456
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Hansen, Author, for the Court En Banc]
Prisoner case - habeas. For the panel's opinion in the matter, see Smulls v. Roper, 467 F.3d 1108 (8th Cir. 2006). By denying Smulls's Batson challenge, the state trial judge implicitly found that the prosecution's proffered nondiscriminatory reasons for his decision to strike the juror were credible, and the absence of any further fact-finding is not a misapplication of established Supreme Court precedent; nor does the absence of explicit findings change this court's obligation to view the state trial court's findings as presumptively correct; Missouri Supreme Court's analysis of the Batson claim was not procedurally flawed, as the court announced and applied the correct standards of review; Missouri courts' analysis of the Batson issue does not constitute an unreasonable determination of the facts based on the evidence contained in the record; that portion of the panel opinion which rejected Smulls' ineffective assistance of counsel claims is reinstated. Judge Bye, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Judge Smith: The dissent asserts that the trial court failed to make the findings and engage in the evaluative process anticipated by Batson and its progeny. 052456P.pdf 11/01/2006 Herbert Smulls v. Donald Roper U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 05-2456 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Hansen and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - habeas. In ruling on and denying Smulls' Batson challenge, the state court refused to recognize and assess all relevant circumstances as required by clearly established federal law; case is remanded to the district court with instructions to, in the district court's discretion, reconstruct the circumstances surrounding Smulls' Batson challenge to determine whether the prosecution's action in striking the only black venireperson was racially motivated; if this proves impossible due the passage of time and other circumstances, the district court should grant Smulls' petition for habeas relief. Judge Hansen, concurring in part and dissenting in part.