DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

052524P.pdf   11/16/2005  United States  v.  Harold Tobacco
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2524
   District of South Dakota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Beam and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - criminal law. Defendant's failed to preserve his
   objections to the court's proposed instructions; reviewing the instructions
   under the plain error standard, the instructions were not erroneous;
   sentence was not unreasonable under the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.
   Sec. 3553(a).