DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

052604P.pdf   07/14/2006  Citizens for Equal Protection  v.  John Bruning
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-2604
   District of Nebraska   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bowman and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case- Constitutional law. The district court erred in holding unconstitutional Nebraska's constitutional amendment (Article 1, Sec. 29 of the Nebraska Constitution) barring same-sex marriage; district court did not err in finding the plaintiffs had standing to bring the challenge and that the case presented a justiciable case or controversy; under a rational- basis standard of review, the amendment did not violate the Equal Protection Clause as the amendment is rationally related to the government interest in steering procreation into marriage; further, this rational basis negates any suspicion that the supporters of the amendment were motivated solely by the desire to punish homosexuals and lesbians; district court also erred in finding the amendment was an unconstitutional Bill of Attainder as the bar on same-sex marriage is not a punishment in the historical bill of attainder sense; the district court also erred in finding the amendment violated plaintiffs' First Amendment rights to associational freedom and to petition the government for redress of grievances.