DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

053064P.pdf   06/20/2006  United States  v.  William See Walker
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3064
   District of North Dakota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Arnold, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. District court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit a defense expert to interview victim of alleged aggravated sexual abuse. Defendant had access to videotaped statement, could cross-examine interviewer and victim, and could have supplied expert addressing weakness of interview techniques. Determination that defendant was a career offender was not error, as conviction for engaging and attempting to engage knowingly in a sexual act with a person under age 12 constitutes a crime of violence because it involves a substantial risk that physical force may be used.