DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

053099P.pdf   07/21/2006  Allianz Ins. Co.  v.  Richard Sanftleben
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3099
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bowman, Author, with Murphy and Benton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case -Insurance. Minnesota law respects choice-of-law provisions
   and as a provision of the policy in question specifically and
   unambiguously identifies Canadian law as controlling on the issues of
   quantum (the only issue to be resolved in this suit), the district court did
   not err in concluding Canadian law applied to the question of uninsured
   motorist benefits; district court did not err in concluding that the plain
   language of the policy barred recovery of uninsured motorist benefits
   under the facts of the claim.