053147P.pdf   07/13/2006  USA  v.  Hercules, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3147
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Fagg and Riley, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Environmental Law. District court correctly applied 
   the standard for divisibility set forth in this court's opinion in 
   U.S. v. Hercules, 247 F.3d 706 (8th Cir. 2001); district court's 
   findings concerning Hercules' responsibility for drummed waste were 
   not erroneous; district court did not err in finding Hercules was 
   responsible for clean-up costs associated with stillbottom drum wastes; 
   district court did not err in finding Hercules was responsible for 
   clean-up costs associated with demolition of the plant; evidence 
   supported district court's findings that Hercules disposed of dioxin-
   contaminated wastes at the Jacksonville Landfill and should be responsible 
   for related clean-up costs; district court did not err in finding the 
   evidence concerning certain soil and groundwater contamination was not 
   detailed enough to permit division of the costs; finding that Uniroyal 
   was liable as an arranger under CERCLA was the law of the case and would 
   not be disturbed; panel was bound by this court's earlier declaration that 
   CERCLA's retroactive application was constitutional.