053316P.pdf   03/11/2008  USA  v.  Roy J. Hudspeth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3316
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author. For the Court En Banc]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. For the panel opinion in the case, see
   United Sates v. Hudspeth, 459 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 2006). Police could
   seize family computer when defendant's wife consented to the seizure,
   even though her husband had, unknown to her, refused to consent to the
   search and seizure when he was arrested at a different location. Judge
   Melloy, dissenting.
  
053316P.pdf   08/25/2006  USA  v.  Roy J. Hudspeth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3316
   Western District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley and Heaney, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Search of defendant's
   business computer and discs was covered by the search warrant issued in
   the case, and defendant consented to search; warrantless search of
   defendant's home computer was not valid, as defendant expressly denied
   consent to conduct the search, and defendant's wife could not overrule
   defendant's decision and consent to the search; defendant waived his
   right to appeal application of the Guidelines to enhance his sentence. 
   Judge Riley, concurring in part and dissenting in part.