DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

053346P.pdf   07/20/2006  USA  v.  James A. Kiel
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3346
   Eastern District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Arnold and John R. Gibson, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in refusing to
   group production of child pornography offenses as the offenses involved
   more than one minor and cannot be grouped under Guidelines Sections
   2G2.1 and 3D1.2; district court did not err in increasing the offense level
   based on the number of minors; district court did not err in denying
   acceptance-of-responsibility reduction when defendant pleaded guilty on
   the last day of trial (after the government had presented the bulk of its
   evidence and the jury had been required to review the child pornography 
   tapes) and failed to accept responsibility for the other minor victims
   portrayed on the tapes.