053766P.pdf   08/30/2006  Sanderson Farms  v.  Lloyd's of London
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3766
   Western District of Arkansas   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Beam and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - Diversity - contract. District court's grant of summary
   judgment to insurer, concluding P & O was not an intended beneficiary of
   the policy and SMG did not have an insurable interest in the cargo at the
   time of the seizure by Russian officials, is affirmed. Title passed at 
   time and place of shipment under C.I F. shipment terms. Claim that CIF
   shipment was typographical error is not considered because it is raised 
   for the first time on appeal. Parol evidence cannot be considered to show
   CIF contrary to intent of parties. Judge Beam dissents.