DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

053873P.pdf   11/30/2006  Eileen Iverson  v.  Pfizer, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3873
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Chief Judge Loken and John R.
   Gibson, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - antitrust. Minnesota consumers claimed drug
   companies unlawfully conspired to suppress importation of
   Canadian prescription drugs for personal use. District
   court's dismissal of federal antitrust claim and refusal
   to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is
   affirmed. Drugs imported from Canada are not labeled in conformity
   with federal law, and are unapproved under Federal Food Drug, and
   Cosmetic Act and thus are prohibited. Plaintiffs failed to show antitrust
   standing to pursue federal antitrust claims, as conduct of defendants did
   not cause an injury of the type the antitrust laws were designed to
   remedy. District court did not abuse its discretion in declining to
   exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims.