053952P.pdf   06/07/2007  United States  v.  Carlous L. Daily
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-3952
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Bowman and Colloton, Circuit
   Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The 180-day time period in Article III(a)
   of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers does not commence until the
   prisoner's request for final disposition of the charges against him has
   actually been delivered to the court and prosecuting officials in the
   jurisdiction lodging the charges, and the district court did not err in
   finding that the period did not begin to run here until the United States
   had notice of defendant's request for disposition of the federal charges;
   there is no per se requirement that a defendant have a pretrial hearing to
   challenge a pretrial identification; this case did not present any
   exceptional circumstances which would require a pretrial hearing on a
   witness's identification of him as the bank robber; the record establishes
   the identification procedures here were not impermissible suggestive.