DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
054183P.pdf 11/17/2006 EEOC v. Dial Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 05-4183
and No: 05-4311
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Hansen and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Employment Discrimination. Evidence, including
statistical evidence, was sufficient for a reasonable jury to
find that defendant had a pattern or practice of intentionally
discriminating against women in its hiring practices; district
court did not err in determining that a pre-employment strength
screening test had a disparate impact on female applicants; nor did
the court err in concluding that the company failed to prove the test
was necessary to establish effective and safe job performance;
district court did not err in awarding back pay to the female
applicants who were refused employment; district court applied the
proper rule for calculating back pay and did not err in rejecting
employer's turnover rate data; court's limited award of health benefit
premiums was proper; case remanded for further back pay proceedings on
one applicant.