DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

054183P.pdf   11/17/2006  EEOC  v.  Dial Corporation
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-4183
                          and No:  05-4311
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Hansen and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Employment Discrimination. Evidence, including statistical evidence, was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find that defendant had a pattern or practice of intentionally discriminating against women in its hiring practices; district court did not err in determining that a pre-employment strength screening test had a disparate impact on female applicants; nor did the court err in concluding that the company failed to prove the test was necessary to establish effective and safe job performance; district court did not err in awarding back pay to the female applicants who were refused employment; district court applied the proper rule for calculating back pay and did not err in rejecting employer's turnover rate data; court's limited award of health benefit premiums was proper; case remanded for further back pay proceedings on one applicant.