DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

061086P.pdf   09/11/2006  Arthur Senty-Haugen  v.  Kevin Goodno
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-1086
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Melloy and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - civil rights. Where plaintiff was committed to the custody
   of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program as a sexual psychopathic
   personality and sexually dangerous person, defendants did not violate
   plaintiff's civil rights when they placed him in isolation as the 
   procedures governing his placement were constitutionally adequate;
   plaintiff failed to show the medical care provided violated his civil
   rights; plaintiff failed to show he was retaliated against for exercise
   of his first amendment rights; negligence claim was properly dismissed;
   claim that imposition of costs of treatment violated plaintiff's due
   process rights should have been dismissed without prejudice.