DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

061559P.pdf   06/19/2007  Craftsmen Limousine  v.  Ford Motor Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-1559
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Wollman, Circuit Judge and
   Nangle, District Judge]
   Civil Case - Antitrust. On remand to apply rule of reason analysis to
   determine whether actions of competitors unreasonably restrained trade in
   the coachbuilding industry, district court did not err in granting summary
   judgment to competitors. Craftsmen failed to satisfy its burden. Relevant
   market consisted of limousines generally, not specialty limousine market
   and Craftsmen failed to show detrimental effects on competition in the
   market for limousines generally and failed to show advertising restraints
   had actual sustained adverse effects on competition or indirect effects. 
   Craftsmen failed to show competitors formed a cartel with the ability to
   collectively exercise market power.