061638P.pdf   01/25/2007  HDC Medical  v.  Mandioc Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-1638
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Antitrust. District court did not err in determining that
   single-use and multiple-use dialyzers are competitors in the same market
   and that defendant did not possess monopoly power in this market; the
   fact that there was a significant price differential between the two
   dialyzers was not the only factor to be considered in determining the
   relevant product market; with respect to plaintiff's anti-competitive
   conduct claim, the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff
   failed to offer any evidence to support its allegations of predatory or
   anti-competitive conduct and that it also failed to show that defendant's
   conduct had a dangerous probability of success.