DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

061647P.pdf   12/13/2006  Henry Hickerson  v.  Pride Mobility
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-1647
   Western District of Missouri   
   [Melloy, Author, with Arnold and Bye, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - products liability. District court erred in excluding plaintiff's expert from testifying as to the point of origin of a fire and his method of determining, through a process of elimination, that defendant's powered scooter was the cause of the fire; under Missouri law, a plaintiff may prove a products liability claim by inference from circumstantial evidence without proof of a specific defect if the evidence tends to eliminate other possible causes, demonstrates that the product was in the same basic condition as supplied by the manufacturer and that the damage suffered would not have occurred in the absence of a defect; here, the evidence was sufficient to meet this test, and the district court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment.