DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
061647P.pdf 12/13/2006 Henry Hickerson v. Pride Mobility
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 06-1647
Western District of Missouri
[Melloy, Author, with Arnold and Bye, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - products liability. District court erred in excluding
plaintiff's expert from testifying as to the point of origin of a
fire and his method of determining, through a process of elimination,
that defendant's powered scooter was the cause of the fire; under
Missouri law, a plaintiff may prove a products liability claim by
inference from circumstantial evidence without proof of a specific
defect if the evidence tends to eliminate other possible causes,
demonstrates that the product was in the same basic condition as
supplied by the manufacturer and that the damage suffered would
not have occurred in the absence of a defect; here, the evidence
was sufficient to meet this test, and the district court erred in
granting defendant's motion for summary judgment.