DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

061857P.pdf   01/26/2007  United States  v.  Adam Rouillard
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-1857
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit
   Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Because defendant's criminal history category score substantially under-represented the seriousness of his past conduct and risk of recidivism, the district court did not err in departing upwards four levels; however, the court's decision to vary upwards another eight levels was not reasonable as there was nothing extraordinary about defendant's offense or his characteristics; district court gave too much weight to defendant's criminal history in setting the variance, as that factor had already been partially recognized in the criminal history and upward departure; it also appears that the sentence would create unwarranted sentencing disparities; case remanded for further proceedings.