DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

062045P.pdf   01/24/2007  United States  v.  Richard W. Gettel
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-2045
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bowman, Author, with Smith and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction. District court did not err in concluding
   search warrant was not fatally stale after two months because defendant
   was incarcerated and could not dispose of evidence and testimony
   supported continued presence of property. District court did not
   abuse its discretion in admitting bad acts evidence of the rifle and
   testimony concerning its origin, as rifle evidence was relevant to
   show relationship and knowledge. District court abused its discretion
   in admitting hearsay testimony under Rule 801(d)(1)(B), but error was
   harmless because testimony was cumulative.