DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

062257P.pdf   01/30/2007  United States  v.  O. Flores-Sandoval
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-2257
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Melloy and Beam, Circuit
   Judges]
   Criminal Case - suppression. District court's findings supporting that
   statements made to immigration officer after defendant was released from
   detention were consensual were not clearly erroneous and Fourth
   Amendment was not implicated by consensual encounter. Police were not
   required to give Miranda warning and thus district court properly denied
   motion to suppress. Statements and fingerprints are untainted evidence of
   identity which the government may use.