DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
062368P.pdf 06/20/2007 Kathy Davison v. City of Minneapolis
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 06-2368
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED][Gruender, Author, with Colloton and Bright, Circuit
Judges]
Civil case - employment discrimination. District court erred in granting
defendant fire chief summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that she was
denied a promotion to the position of arson investigator in retaliation for
her public comments on the City's fire department as there was sufficient
evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether her
protected association and speech activities were a substantial or
motivating factor in the chief's decisions not to promote her; the evidence
that the fire chief knew of the protected activities and expressed
displeasure with them, in combination with the proximity of three
promotion denials, constitutes sufficient evidence to create a genuine
issue of material fact as to whether the decisions were at least in part
motivated by plaintiff's constitutionally protected activities; there was
also sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to
whether the chief would have made the same decision in the absence of
plaintiff's activity; district court did not err in granting City's motion
for summary judgment, however, as there was no evidence of a policy,
officially adopted and promulgated by the City, or a practice, so
permanent and well-settled so as to constitute a custom, that existed and
through which the chief acted to deny plaintiff's promotion; without
authority delegated to him, either by the City Charter or Code of
Ordinances, to make final municipal policy regarding employment
practices, the chief's final decision-making authority regarding whom to
promote is insufficient to subject the City to liability for his actions.
Judge Colloton, concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part.