DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

062368P.pdf   06/20/2007  Kathy Davison  v.  City of Minneapolis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-2368
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED][Gruender, Author, with Colloton and Bright, Circuit
   Judges]
Civil case - employment discrimination. District court erred in granting defendant fire chief summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that she was denied a promotion to the position of arson investigator in retaliation for her public comments on the City's fire department as there was sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether her protected association and speech activities were a substantial or motivating factor in the chief's decisions not to promote her; the evidence that the fire chief knew of the protected activities and expressed displeasure with them, in combination with the proximity of three promotion denials, constitutes sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the decisions were at least in part motivated by plaintiff's constitutionally protected activities; there was also sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the chief would have made the same decision in the absence of plaintiff's activity; district court did not err in granting City's motion for summary judgment, however, as there was no evidence of a policy, officially adopted and promulgated by the City, or a practice, so permanent and well-settled so as to constitute a custom, that existed and through which the chief acted to deny plaintiff's promotion; without authority delegated to him, either by the City Charter or Code of Ordinances, to make final municipal policy regarding employment practices, the chief's final decision-making authority regarding whom to promote is insufficient to subject the City to liability for his actions. Judge Colloton, concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part.