DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

062590P.pdf   07/19/2007  Farmers Bank of  v.  U.S. Dept. of Agric.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-2590
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Crop insurance. The Department did not err in denying the
   Bank's request for reimbursement of certain defaulted loans, as the
   Department's conclusion that the bank failed to act as a reasonably
   prudent lender when it made the loans was supported by substantial
   evidence; however, the administrative record does not contain sufficient
   evidence to support the Departments's conclusion that the bank was
   negligent in servicing two earlier rounds of loans to the defaulting
   borrowers, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.