DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

062875P.pdf   05/02/2007  United States  v.  Todd Douglas Miller
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-2875
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with O'Connor, Associate Justice
   (Ret.) and Wollman, Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Whether defendant's sentence was viewed
   as a 100% or 77% variance from the applicable Guidelines range, it was
   atypical and greater than the court has deemed reasonable; while the
   district court recited the factors set out in Sec. 3553(a), it failed to 
   give appropriate weight to the seriousness of the offense, the need to 
   promote respect for the drug laws, the importance of ensuring deterrence, 
   and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities; case remanded 
   for resentencing.