063094P.pdf   07/12/2007  Joyce M. Shockency  v.  Ramsey County
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3094
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Wollman and John R. Gibson,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiff police officers have alleged
   sufficient facts to show that the defendant sheriff caused them to
   suffer material changes in their employment that rose to the level
   of adverse employment actions in retaliation for their exercise of
   their First Amendment rights, and the district court did not err in
   denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment based on qualified
   immunity; defendant O'Hara was entitled to qualified immunity because
   the law was not clearly established that the actions he took with
   respect to plaintiff Moore had employment consequences serious enough
   to amount to adverse employment actions; court had no jurisdiction
   to address the county's immunity defense in this interlocutory appeal.