DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

063212P.pdf   01/24/2008  USA  v.  Stephen Gill, et al
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3212
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley and Hansen, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Based on the totality of the circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion to expand the scope of the traffic stop to include an investigation into whether the defendants were transporting contraband; asking questions and seeking to obtain consent to search the defendants' truck were reasonable and permissible methods of continuing the investigation and did not unduly prolong the investigation; defendant Riley was not unlawfully detained at the time she consented to a search of the truck and her consent was voluntary; district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to reopen the record on the motion to suppress to admit evidence of polygraph testing as the evidence would have been of limited probative value; no error in admitting testimony from a DEA agent concerning the link between firearms possession and drug distribution as it assisted the jury in understanding the business of drug trafficking; district court did not err in rejecting defendant Gill's proposed instruction on the definition of reasonable doubt to be applied in circumstantial evidence cases; instructions on defendant Gill's firearm offense did not amend the indictment and the instructions, while erroneous, did not require reversal because they did not affect Gill's substantial rights; evidence was sufficient to support conviction for carrying a firearm while trafficking.