DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

063252P.pdf   10/04/2007  USA  v.  Christopher Myers
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3252
                          and No:  06-3581
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Bye and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case - conviction. Conviction and sentence for mailing threatening communications are affirmed. District court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance, as there was sufficient time to prepare for trial and defendant did not show prejudice. Admission of evidence of new threatening letters mailed during litigation was not error, as they show absence of mistake or accident; one-year gap does not destroy probative value of evidence; district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Rule 403. District court did not err in failing to hold hearing on post-trial motions. Sufficient evidence was presented that defendant caused threatening letters to be mailed. District court's issuance of 60-month sentence, based on a downward variance of 40%, is not unreasonable. District court fully explained the rationale for rejecting the advisory guidelines range and set forth enough to satisfy the court that sentence with mental health treatment and supervised release was the most effective sentence.