DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
063252P.pdf 10/04/2007 USA v. Christopher Myers
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 06-3252
and No: 06-3581
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Bye and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case - conviction. Conviction and sentence for mailing
threatening communications are affirmed. District court did not abuse its
discretion in denying motion for continuance, as there was sufficient time
to prepare for trial and defendant did not show prejudice. Admission of
evidence of new threatening letters mailed during litigation was not error,
as they show absence of mistake or accident; one-year gap does not
destroy probative value of evidence; district court did not abuse its
discretion in admitting evidence under Rule 403. District court did not
err in failing to hold hearing on post-trial motions. Sufficient evidence
was presented that defendant caused threatening letters to be mailed.
District court's issuance of 60-month sentence, based on a downward
variance of 40%, is not unreasonable. District court fully explained the
rationale for rejecting the advisory guidelines range and set forth enough
to satisfy the court that sentence with mental health treatment and
supervised release was the most effective sentence.