063291P.pdf   09/08/2008  United States  v.  Peter Boesen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3291
                          and No:  07-2217
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and
   Gruender, Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. District court did not err
   in ruling defendant could not introduce video evidence he created after
   his indictment to cross-examine witnesses until after he took the stand, as
   the ruling did not prejudice defendant because he was free to recall the
   witnesses and chose not to; claim of prosecutorial misconduct rejected;
   judge's comment outside the hearing of the jury was not ground for a new
   trial; the court did not err in allowing the government to introduce charts
   summarizing client billing; evidence was sufficient to support conviction
   for fraudulent health care billing; district court did not err in calculating
   the amount of the loss caused by defendant's fraud; no error in imposing
   an enhancement for obstruction of justice based on the court's conclusion
   defendant perjured himself at trial; district court erred in granting
   defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy count,
   as the evidence presented by the government was sufficient to support the
   conviction.