DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

063510P.pdf   01/22/2008  Taxi Connection  v.  Dakota, MN & Eastern
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3510
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with John R. Gibson and Wollman,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Contracts. Complaint alleging the defendant violated the
   Minnesota Human Rights Act when it terminated plaintiff's contract in
   retaliation for complaining about sexual harassment of one of its drivers
   was time barred because the suit was not brought within one year of the
   discriminatory act; breach of contract claim was properly dismissed, as
   defendant's employee's statement that she would investigate and resolve
   the complaint did not form a contract; nor did the statement provide a
   basis for a claim of promissory estoppel since plaintiff could not show
   detrimental reliance.