DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

063580P.pdf   08/24/2007  Walter Wagner  v.  Michael J. Astrue
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-3580
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Melloy and Gruender, Circuit
   Judges]
   Civil case - Social Security. ALJ was entitled to discount treating
   physician's November, 2004 opinion because it was inconsistent with
   other opinions he gave in 2003 and 2005; ALJ did not err in concluding
   claimant's testimony concerning his subjective complaints had to be
   discounted in light of his daily activities; ALJ did not err in finding
   claimant retained the residual functional capacity to perform his past
   relevant work.