066024P.pdf   10/19/2006  Cargill, Inc.  v.  Man Financial Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  06-6024
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Mahoney and McDonald, Bankruptcy
   Judges]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has authority
   to review remand order, and fact that appellant did not seek a stay of
   the order did not deprive the court of jurisdiction; motion to remand
   was timely because the remand procedure described by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1447,
   which includes a 30-day time limit, does not preempt the different
   remand procedure that applies to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1452(b), which permits
   remand on any equitable ground without mentioning a time limit; matters
   at issue were core matters, and the court erred in remanding the removed
   action back to Minnesota state court; the bankruptcy court is instructed
   to transfer this action to the United States Bankruptcy Court of the
   Southern District of New York, where the litigation pending in that
   court will address many of the issues asserted here.