DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

071149P.pdf   02/08/2008  State of Missouri  v.  U.S. Army Corps of Eng.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-1149
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Loken, Author, with Riley and Smith,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - environmental law. Decision by U.S. Army Corps of
   Engineers to revise Master Manual to include a bimodal spring rise plan
   without preparing a supplemental environmental impact statement was
   not arbitrary and capricious, as neither a substantial change or significant
   new circumstances were presented. The Corps did not violate NEPA
   when it did not follow the environmental assessment with either an
   environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact, as
   the impact was sufficiently analyzed in an earlier final environmental
   impact statement.