072060P.pdf   11/17/2008  Stephen Engleman  v.  Deputy Murray
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-2060
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Bye and Beam, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - civil rights. In the factual situation presented in the
   case, it was objectively reasonable for the officer executing an arrest
   warrant for plaintiff to believe that he was executing the arrest warrant
   in Arkansas; as a result, the arrest did not violate the Fourth Amendment,
   and defendant was entitled to qualified immunity. Judge Bye, dissenting,
   and writing that plaintiff's out-of-state arrest violated his clearly
   established rights, and a genuine issue of material fact remained as to
   whether it was reasonably objective for defendant to believe he was
   arresting plaintiff in Arkansas rather than Oklahoma.