DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

072181P.pdf   04/11/2008  United States  v.  Billy Love
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-2181
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Bye and Beam, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction. District court did not abuse its discretion
   in excluding cross-examination testimony that would have elicited
   inadmissible hearsay testimony. Although defendant claimed statement
   was offered for limited purpose of showing the investigation was not
   thoroughly conducted, statement reveals investigation was not thorough
   only if the statement were true and thus was offered for the truth of the
   matter and constituted hearsay. Even if error, the error was harmless.