DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

072325P.pdf   07/01/2008  United States  v.  Nabil Abumayyaleh
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-2325
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with John R. Gibson and Benton, Circuit
   Judges]
Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. Government's conduct did not rise to level of entrapment, as defendant was given opportunity to purchase firearm after becoming acquainted with undercover officer and district court did not err in denying motion for judgment as a matter of law. Sufficient evidence was presented he possessed a firearm found in the office. Warrant to search was supported by probable cause and was of no consequence that items listed in the affidavit were not actually stolen. Discovery of evidence under plain view doctrine need not be inadvertent. Admission of prior conviction was permissible to show predisposition once defendant asserted entrapment and district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence. District court erred in applying enhancement for stolen firearm because firearm was not stolen. Case is remanded for resentencing.