DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

072639P.pdf   07/17/2008  United States  v.  Jackie Porchay
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-2639
                          and No:  07-2787
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Riley,
   Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Forfeiture. District court did not err in converting
   Porchay's Rule 41(g) claim into a 21 U.S.C. Sec. 853(n) claim once it
   found she had no standing to assert a Rule 41(g) claim because she was
   no longer a criminal defendant; district court did not err in ruling against
   Porchay on the Sec. 853(n) claim because she failed to prove she
   possessed an interest in the subject property; district court did not err in
   awarding plaintiff no attorneys' fees under the Hyde Act, as the
   government's position was not taken in bad faith and the prosecution was
   not frivolous or vexatious.