DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

072705P.pdf   03/13/2009  Alfred Flowers  v.  City of Minneapolis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-2705
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Bye and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. For the court's previous opinion in the case, see Flowers v. City of Minneapolis, 478 F.3d 869 (8th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff failed to show that he was targeted for police surveillance and harassment on the basis of his race; while a police officer's investigative decisions remain subject to traditional class-based equal protection analysis, they may be not be attacked in a class-of-one equal protection claim; plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence that he was harassed because of his decision to plead not guilty in a previous criminal matter; because plaintiff cannot establish that an individual officer violated the Constitution, the district court correctly dismissed his claim against the City for allegedly maintaining an unconstitutional custom or policy; grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant officer on plaintiff's defamation claim affirmed.