DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

073225P.pdf   03/11/2009  Highway Sales  v.  Blue Bird Corporation
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-3225
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Civil case. In case alleging the Recreational Vehicle plaintiff Oren purchased was defective, the district court erred in granting defendant summary judgment on Oren's claim for breach of express warranties on the ground the claim was time-barred, as there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the date Oren knew or should have known defendant was unable to maintain the RV as warranted; district court did not err in finding the time for filing a claim for breach of implied warranties had expired and that Oren had failed to show he was entitled to equitable tolling; a plaintiff who passes his "lemon" off to another consumer before trial cannot pursue a claim under Minnesota's Lemon Law; the district court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on Oren's revocation of acceptance claims against Blue Bird and Shorewood RV, as there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Oren effectively revoked acceptance as to Shorewood; assuming Oren's revocation of acceptance was effective against Shorewood, his resale of the RV did not constitute reacceptance. Judge Beam, concurring in part and dissenting in part.