DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

073516P.pdf   07/31/2008  United States  v.  Marvin Hayes
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-3516
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Murphy and Bye, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Record showed the court's adequately considered the sentencing factors set out in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553(a); by statute, defendant's federal sentence did not commence at the time of sentencing as he was "on loan" from state authorities pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum and was not committed to federal custody after his sentencing; district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the federal sentence should be served consecutively to defendant's state time. Judge Bye, dissenting and asserting the district court committed a significant procedural error by failing to recognize the full extent of its sentencing authority to make defendant's sentence concurrent with his state time.