DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

073627P.pdf   01/23/2009  Coyne's & Co., Inc.  v.  Enesco, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-3627
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Smith,
   Circuit Judge]
   Civil case - Minnesota Franchise Act. District court's conclusion that a
   distribution agreement was not subject to the Minnesota Franchise Act
   because plaintiff did not pay a direct or indirect franchise fee to the other
   party was not erroneous; as a result the agreement did not fall within the
   protections of the Minnesota Franchise Act for purposes of a preliminary
   injunction.