DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

073750P.pdf   07/07/2008  United States  v.  Jeffrey Mathew Jeanetta
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-3750
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law. Two week period between controlled buy and issuance of a search warrant did not render the informant's information presumptively stale; totality of the evidence supported conclusion that defendant was involved in illegal drug activities and that evidence of his crime would be found at his address; because defendant was in state custody, the provisions of Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure did not apply to the delay in his arraignment; defendant's right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment was not violated; no error in allowing expert testimony from a police officer concerning the drug trade significance of some of the items seized from defendant's house,