076010P.pdf   09/24/2007  In the matter of Jo-Ann Goldma  v.  
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-6010
                          and No:  07-6016
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas   
   [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Kressel, Chief Judge, and
   Mahoney, Bankruptcy Judge]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The sua sponte order directing the trustee
   to show cause why she should not be removed from a case and sanctioned
   did not sufficiently describe the facts forming the basis for her removal,
   and the removal order is reversed; in a second case, the notice provided
   did not give the trustee adequate notice that her handling of a refund
   could be grounds for removal, and that charge could not be considered in
   evaluating the propriety of the removal order; however, the show cause
   order was sufficient with respect to two other actions - providing false
   testimony and acting while under a conflict of interest - and those two
   charges could be considered; hearing on the charges was adequate to
   protect the trustee's due process rights; evidence established the two
   charges and the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in removing the
   trustee on those grounds. Judge Kressel, concurring in part and dissenting
   in part; Judge Mahoney, concurring in part and dissenting in part.