076046P.pdf   07/27/2009  GAF Holdings, Inc.  v.  Philip Rinaldi
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-6046
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kressel, Author, with Schermer and Mahoney,
   Bankruptcy Judges]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. For the Panel's prior opinion in the
   matter, see GAF Holdings, LLC v. Rinaldi (In re Farmland Industries,
   Inc.), 378 B.R. 829 (8th Cir. 2007). For the Eighth Circuit's opinion
   reversing that decision and remanding the matter, see GAF Holdings,
   LLC v. Rinaldi (In re Farmland Industries, Inc.) 567 F.3d 1010) (8th Cir.
   2009). The bankruptcy court did not err in dismissing the action because
   GAF's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be
   granted; GAF lacked standing to pursue its action because it was not an
   aggrieved party; GAF's action was barred by the doctrine of collateral
   estoppel and by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363(m).
  
076046P.pdf   12/05/2007  GAF Holdings, Inc.  v.  Philip Rinaldi
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  07-6046
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri   
   [PUBLISHED] [Schermer, Author, with Kressel, Chief Judge, and McDonald, 
   Bankruptcy Judge]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court lacked subject matter 
   jurisdiction over a complaint between non-debtor entities seeking
   damages for intentional interference with a business expectancy and
   civil conspiracy; case remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.