DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
081103P.pdf 12/01/2008 Rodney Ballard v. David Heineman
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-1103
District of Nebraska - Lincoln
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - civil rights. Plaintiffs failed to present any specific evidence
controverting defendants' evidence that the officer stopped the plaintiffs'
vehicle after observing a traffic offense and searched the vehicle after
obtaining the occupants' consent, and, as a result, the district court did
not err in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment as there
was no genuine issue of material fact from which a jury could conclude
that a constitutional violation had occurred; because plaintiff never filed a
proper Rule 56(f) motion, the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying further discover or in deciding the motion on the basis of the
record before it.