DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081103P.pdf   12/01/2008  Rodney Ballard  v.  David Heineman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1103
   District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - civil rights. Plaintiffs failed to present any specific evidence controverting defendants' evidence that the officer stopped the plaintiffs' vehicle after observing a traffic offense and searched the vehicle after obtaining the occupants' consent, and, as a result, the district court did not err in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment as there was no genuine issue of material fact from which a jury could conclude that a constitutional violation had occurred; because plaintiff never filed a proper Rule 56(f) motion, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying further discover or in deciding the motion on the basis of the record before it.