DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081390P.pdf   10/23/2008  Missouri Coalition for the Env  v.  FERC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1390
   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Murphy and Arnold, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - National Environmental Policy Act. Petition for review of FERC order authorizing reconstruction of the Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project is denied. Missouri Parks Association lacks standing to petition for review because it did not request rehearing before the agency. Missouri Coalition for the Environment has Article III standing because any risk to environmental harm is germane to its mission, but may only raise cumulative impact claim because it did not assert other claims in its rehearing petition before the agency. Because reconstruction will not influence the relicensing operation, relicensing is not a reasonably foreseeable future action, and FERC decision not to include impact of relicensing operation in its environmental assessment of reconstruction was not arbitrary or capricious.